1/21/2012
When You Wish Upon A Czar
1/20/2012
1/19/2012
The Devil Is In The Details
At age 76 when you most need it, you are not eligible for cancer treatments
See page 272
What Nancy Pelosi didn't want us to know until after the healthcare bill was passed. Remember she said, "pass it and then read it!!."
Here it is!
THE CARE BILL HB 3200. JUDGE KITHIL IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILL. Judge Kithil of Marble Falls, TX - highlighted the most egregious pages of HB3200Please read this........ especially the reference to pages 58 & 59 JUDGE KITHIL wrote: *
* Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally. *
* Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts. *
* Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN). *
* Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?) *
* Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees. *
* Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age. *
* Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception. *
* Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years. (Death counseling..) *
* Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.
HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on to identify: "Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. Members of Congress are already exempt from the Social Security system, and have a well-funded private plan that covers their retirement needs. If they were on our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick 'fix' to make the plan financially sound for their future."
Honorable David Kithil of Marble Falls, Texas
What Global Warming, Gore?
1/17/2012
What Next?
1/16/2012
OJ Simpson
MIAMI — Like tens of thousands of other Florida homeowners, imprisoned former football star O.J. Simpson is in danger of losing his house to foreclosure.
Miami-Dade Circuit Court records show that JPMorgan Chase filed for foreclosure in September on the four-bedroom, four-bath house south of downtown Miami. Simpson's attorney has since filed a motion to dismiss the case, but there has been no further action since November.
Simpson bought the 4,233-square-foot house in 2000 for $575,000, property records show. Its current assessed value is $478,401, with property taxes of about $9,000. The 2011 taxes were paid in December.
The 64-year-old former football star and actor is serving a nine-to-33-year prison sentence stemming from a 2007 armed confrontation with sports memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas casino hotel room. Simpson was convicted of kidnapping, armed robbery and other charges. He is appealing the conviction.
1/15/2012
What were they thinking?

Dieter Zetsche, head of the Mercedes Benz unit of Daimler AG, revealed the controversial ad during a presentation Tuesday at the International Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. (Daimier AG, Handout / January 13, 2012)
I believe they have now pulled the ad, but, wow. What were they thinking?
1/13/2012
Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall
Lettin' It Snow
1/12/2012
Spoken Like A True Conservative
HaHahahahaha!! I just love my dumbshit lib neighbors. Well...not really...but it's always fun to mess with them.
Was out getting the paper and ran into one of my most uber liberal neighbors, Ron. Apparently the battery in his Prius is dead so he was just wandering around the car unsure of what to do is my guess.
.Anyways, he has a college age son I found out not too long ago was one of those OWS dipshits in NY!So I asked Ron..." How's jr's campaign to topple capitalism going?"He responded "he's back home...the weather was really cold in NY & the cops were not cooperating(WTF?!?!?)"
. He then asked how I was doing and what I have been up to.I said "I've been working...ALOT, non stop matter of fact". I guess your son spent 3 months in NY for nothing cause last I heard Capitalism is alive and well....he should look into one of those job things...beats squatting on public property and dirtying up parks". "Oh...and good luck with your battery issue......you DO know you'll need ELECTRICITY to charge that thing, right"??Ahahahahahahaha...USELESS!! ALL OF THEM.
Like, Oh My
Change
1/11/2012
She's A Believer! A Must Watch
Moving On Up!
1/10/2012
Watch Closely
False Prophet
“Will a gay person be accepted into heaven, as you see it?,” Oprah asked the famed pastor. “I believe they will,” he responded. ”Sometimes we look at gay being a bigger sin than being proud or not telling the truth. I don’t think God categorizes sins.”
Truth is, Mr. Osteen, unless the homosexual, the sinner, repents of his sin, his final destination will most definitely, without a doubt, be Hell! Why didn't he answer according to God's word? Easy answer. Mr. Osteen tells people what they want to hear, and what people want to hear is that everyone is going to heaven as long as they're good.
Aw, the El Salvadorians. We love 'em. We'll let 'em stay.
."SERIOUSLY? And just how many El Salvadorians are we talking?
"The protected status designation current applies to 215,000 Salvadorans living in the U.S. illegally and otherwise subject to deportation, and remittances from ex-patriate Salvadorans in the United States help keep that country's economy afloat."
It is an election year after all, so this really comes as no surprise. I love how they refer to the earthquakes in 2001 as an excuse. Why should we give a rats a** if El Salvador is not able to 'adequately handle' the return of 215,000 of their OWN people?
They are here illegally, for Pete's sake! If you or I tried to go to Iran or North Korea, how do you think that would work put for us? Hell, you can't even reside in Costa Rica without proving you have an adequate income to sustain yourself!
DHS Nazis
http://www.psywarrior.com/Goebbels.html
The radio will be to the twentieth century what the press was to the nineteenth"
-Josef Goebbels, 1933.
1/09/2012
Daley is Out
…In the Obama White House, you have the Oval Office, and you have Jarrett’s office on the second floor. That second floor office has been where the real power has resided. That is no exaggeration. Jarrett has people around the Oval Office who report back to her. Everything. She sets the agenda and that agenda is sent directly to the president, who more often than not, never questions it. And as Jarrett assumed more control over the day to day operations of the West Wing, the president happily backed away. He had little interest in policy. He had even less interest in the work to form that policy. As long as he “looks good” – that’s all that matters to him, right? I know I’m repeating myself a bit here, but I’m getting to it.
....."Daley has support far greater than Valerie Jarrett’s relationship to the Obamas. They need him, and he knows that. And when Bill Daley leaves that White House, it will be on his terms, not theirs....
Nobody has ever challenged her absolute authority in the White House – until Bill Daley."
Go read all of it at link below:
http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/09/bill-daley-out-time-for-a-look-back-at-what-insider-told-us-way-back-when/
1/08/2012
Odumbos cronies response to the fairy tale Party
Alice in Wonderland
"White House officials were so nervous about how a splashy, Hollywood-esque party would look to jobless Americans or their representatives in Congress, who would soon vote on health care that the event was not discussed publicly and Burton's and Depp's contributions went unacknowledged," Miss Kantor writes.
Do not despair though. Even though they kept the lavish party under wraps (until now that is), it hasn't stopped the king and queen in the WH from throwing gala parties at our expense. Oh, and unemployment is still high with ten million unemployed Americans and businesses continue to shut their doors. Long live King Obama and her excellency.
1/06/2012
Gingrich vs. Obama
The following was written by a friend and she has graciously given me permission to post it here. Thank you,
Diane!
OK, let me start off by saying that personally I like Newt. I would happily support him if he were to get the nomination. I think he is a brilliant man, a patriot, and a great debater. However, even if he was to get the nomination here's why he CANNOT beat NO-bama (and there's NO personal baggage in here) and what NO-bama's machine WILL use against him:
In an appearance WITH Hillary Clinton, Newt said he WOULD support a 'transfer of finances' from the rich to the poor. (The Washington Post 7/22/05)
Newt supported giving amnesty to 3 million ILLEGAL immigrants. (FOX News, 'On the Record with Greta van Susteren,' 5/5.10)
In Congress, Newt co-sponsored, yes co-sponsored 418 bills WITH the infamous Nancy Pelosi. (The Daily caller, 12/6/11)
Newt was the only Speaker of the House to be reprimanded for ethical wrongdoing, which led to a $300,000 fine. (The Washington Post 1/22/97) Yes, I know the fine was reduced and the charges somewhat revised and lowered but it still would be ammo for NO-bama's political machine.
Freddie Mac paid Newt $30,000 an hour, totaling at least $1.6 million, just before it helped cause our economic meltdown. (Cleo Benson and John McCormick, "Gingrich said to be paid about $1.6 million by Freddie Mac" Bloomberg 11/16/11 / Dan Eggen, "Gingrich said he spent just an hour a month advising Freddie Mac." The Washington Post 11/18/11)
Whether any of this is overinflated or not, sadly, because of this baggage, NO-bama could probably beat Newt in a head-to-head. And this does NOT encompass 'social baggage' which personally I could care less about because in this election, the social issues MUST be put on the back burner, just for a short time, while we fight for our county's very survival.
Bottom line, we ALL must unite behind whomever is nominated, who the Republicans feel has the best chance of beating NO-bama, even if it means closing our eyes while we push that lever. We, as citizens of the nation we all love and cherish, will NOT survive another 4 years of the usurper, and that is the bottom line.
In an appearance WITH Hillary Clinton, Newt said he WOULD support a 'transfer of finances' from the rich to the poor. (The Washington Post 7/22/05)
Newt supported giving amnesty to 3 million ILLEGAL immigrants. (FOX News, 'On the Record with Greta van Susteren,' 5/5.10)
In Congress, Newt co-sponsored, yes co-sponsored 418 bills WITH the infamous Nancy Pelosi. (The Daily caller, 12/6/11)
Newt was the only Speaker of the House to be reprimanded for ethical wrongdoing, which led to a $300,000 fine. (The Washington Post 1/22/97) Yes, I know the fine was reduced and the charges somewhat revised and lowered but it still would be ammo for NO-bama's political machine.
Freddie Mac paid Newt $30,000 an hour, totaling at least $1.6 million, just before it helped cause our economic meltdown. (Cleo Benson and John McCormick, "Gingrich said to be paid about $1.6 million by Freddie Mac" Bloomberg 11/16/11 / Dan Eggen, "Gingrich said he spent just an hour a month advising Freddie Mac." The Washington Post 11/18/11)
Whether any of this is overinflated or not, sadly, because of this baggage, NO-bama could probably beat Newt in a head-to-head. And this does NOT encompass 'social baggage' which personally I could care less about because in this election, the social issues MUST be put on the back burner, just for a short time, while we fight for our county's very survival.
Bottom line, we ALL must unite behind whomever is nominated, who the Republicans feel has the best chance of beating NO-bama, even if it means closing our eyes while we push that lever. We, as citizens of the nation we all love and cherish, will NOT survive another 4 years of the usurper, and that is the bottom line.
Arrogant A**
By Amie Parnes - 01/06/12 12:45 PM ET
Two days after defying Republicans and appointing Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, President Obama visited the new agency to take a little time to gloat.
Making a victory lap of sorts at the independent agency, Obama cracked a joke, telling employees that he came by to help their new director move in.
More seriously, a seemingly content Obama called the man he tapped a “great director who is tailor-made to lead this agency.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What a complete jerk-a-zooid this clown is! He's gloating because he knows his appointee is one more nail in the coffin of this country.
U.S. citizen
Background investigation
May be required to serve a one year trial period
What?? No college degree? No experience? I think Obama should apply. But, wait, he is not a U.S. citizen and wouldn't pass a legitimate background investigation.
The Atrocity of Planned Parenthood
"When compared with previous annual reports, the latest one shows an almost steady increase in the number of abortions performed at its clinics: In 2006, Planned Parenthood did 289,750 abortions; in 2007, it did 305,310; in 2009, it did 331,796; and, in 2010, it did 329,445–a small decrease from the previous year.
The annual report for fiscal year 2008-2009 does not include abortion or adoption figures, but a PPFA Fact Sheet posted on its Web site and said to be current as of September 2010, states that 324,008 abortions were performed at Planned Parenthood clinics around the country in 2008.
HERE IS HOW MANY ADOPTION REFERRALS THEY HAVE MADE:
According to PPFA’s annual report for fiscal year 2007-2008, in 2007 Planned Parenthood’s “adoption referrals to other agencies” totaled 4,912. In Fiscal Year 2010 that number was 841, a decrease of 82.8 percent."
So, as anyone with half a brain can plainly see, Planned Parenthood is nothing but a federal and state funded organization that encourages and performs abortions.now, I suppose if you are pro choice then you have no problem with the murdering of unborn babies. I love how this person put it, which echoes precisely the way I feel:
"Occasionally, folks wonder why I’m passionately pro-life. I tell them it’s because I’m passionately pro-choice. That is, I desperately want young girls to realize that, yes, every woman has a choice — until she doesn’t. Every woman has a choice before she gets pregnant. After she’s pregnant, the choice is gone. She will forever have been a mother, for however brief a time — and no abortion erases that. A woman’s body knows that, even if her mind and heart don’t. Sadly, more often than not, her heart realizes it, too. But where is Planned Parenthood after an abortion? Nowhere to be found. It’s up to organizations like Project Rachel to help women cope with the devastating and undisclosed aftermath of an abortion."
Last year, Planned Parenthood received $487.4 million in taxpayer money — but, as long as abortions account for 11 percent of its services, it doesn’t deserve a dime.
1/05/2012
This Is Awesome!
What Is Going On?
The TSA has been responsible for over 9,000 unannounced “security checkpoints” over the last year alone, as the federal agency’s VIPR program expands to become a literal occupying army in the name of safety.
The TSA’s 25 “viper” teams — for Visible Intermodal Prevention and Response — have run more than 9,300 unannounced checkpoints and other search operations in the last year. Department of Homeland Security officials have asked Congress for funding to add 12 more teams next year.- Why is DHS setting up checkpoints at Social Security offices in the first place?
- Why random checkpoints along some of our highways?
- If they're really looking for illegal immigrants, as they claim, then WHY not do something, anything at all to secure our borders?
He's doing it 'His Way' no matter What
More Control. In Illinois
1/04/2012
Shredding Our Constitution-Recess Appointment
"A defiant President Barack Obama, tired of Senate Republicans stalling his nominee to lead a new consumer protection agency, put him in charge Wednesday over their opposition.
"I refuse to take `no' for an answer," the president said.
Outraged GOP leaders in Congress immediately suggested that courts would determine whether Richard Cordray's appointment was illegal."
GO HERE FOR MORE
Remember, this is an election year, so Obama's got to do as much destroying as he can, just in case he's not re-elected. We'll be lucky if there's a country left by November at this rate.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/04/president-obama-to-appoint-consumer-watchdog-while-congress-is-at-home/?test=latestnews#ixzz1iWK6ufFf
1/03/2012
Did You Know?
1/02/2012
1/01/2012
Yes, Really
Do you believe him? Today, he has said he has the power to detain American citizens indefinitely without a trial, but says he won't . Believe it????? You'd have to be a fool to believe this guy. Why have the language in the Bill? Just in case? Heres the idiot, in his own words:
"Moreover, I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens. Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a Nation. My Administration will interpret section 1021 in a manner that ensures that any detention it authorizes complies with the Constitution, the laws of war, and all other applicable law."
Again...I ask. Then WHY have the language in the BIll if you honestly never have any attention of using it.
Happy New Year to my conservative, smart friends. We may all be FEMA roomies soon.
Happy New Year to my liberal, not so smart friends. I still fail to understand you and am begging you to please stay away from the voting booths come November. Thank you!
Happy New Year to my Late to the party former Obamabots. You were ignorant and easily swayed in 2008, and it is because of people like you that we have the idiot in chief Kenyan squatter in the White House today. Thank you for finally waking from your slumber and screaming 'holy crap what have we done!'. Little too late, I'm afraid. Perhaps, you'll do the right thing in 2012 and prevent him from not being re-elected.
Sneaky, Slimy Obama
Happy New Year!!!!! Our dear, egotistical, arrogant and American hater President immensely enjoyed his New Years Eve last night. While you were toasting a healthy and prosperous new year, or watching fireworks, Obama was signing into law the Bill that many are not even aware of. Yup. That'd be the Bill that gives him and the military to detain you indefinitely and without a trial. Gitmo anyone? Hmmm.
The Bill is 1844 pages long. I've just started going through it, because I know darn well there are lots of other goodies in it that we don't even know about yet. Most important for now, is Section 1021, below. Gotta go for now. Church services with our daughter.
Subtitle D—Counterterrorism SEC. 1021. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AU- THORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE. (a) IN GENERAL.—Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military
2 Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes
3 the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States
4 to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b))
5 pending disposition under the law of war.
6 (b) COVERED PERSONS.—A covered person under
7 this section is any person as follows:
8 (1) A person who planned, authorized, com-
9 mitted, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred
10 on September 11, 2001, or harbored those respon-
11 sible for those attacks.
12 (2) A person who was a part of or substantially
13 supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces
14 that are engaged in hostilities against the United
15 States or its coalition partners, including any person
16 who has committed a belligerent act or has directly
17 supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy
18 forces.
AND how long can they hold you? Indefinitely. Without a trial. Here's the language:
Detention under the law of war without
23 trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the
24 Authorization for Use of Military Force.
































